Choose the right CodeSubmit assessment format
Compare Take-Home Challenges, CodePair, and Screening Bytes so you can pick the right workflow for the role.

Choose the right CodeSubmit assessment format
CodeSubmit centers around three assessment formats in the product: Take-Home Challenges, CodePair, and Screening Bytes. The best choice depends on where the candidate is in your process and what signal you need next.
Take-Home Challenges
Use a take-home challenge when you want candidates to work through a realistic engineering task on their own time. In the app, these assignments can be customized with frameworks, libraries, custom files, and open-ended prompts so the work looks closer to the role you are hiring for.
- Best for deeper async evaluation
- Useful when you want to see code structure, judgment, and delivery habits
- Good fit for product engineering, backend, frontend, and full-stack roles
CodePair
Use CodePair when you want a live session with a shared IDE, terminal, Git workflow, and live application support. CodePair is the closest fit for collaborative interviews where communication, tradeoff thinking, and live debugging matter.
- Best for live technical interviews
- Useful when you want to see how candidates navigate unfamiliar code or requirements in real time
- Strong fit for pair programming, systems work, and practical follow-up interviews
Screening Bytes
Use Bytes when you need a shorter, earlier-stage screen. Bytes are test-driven coding tasks scored automatically, which makes them a strong option for higher-volume pipelines or for narrowing the field before deeper review.
- Best for quick signal up front
- Useful when you need consistency across many candidates
- Good fit for screening before a challenge or live session
Simple decision rule
- Start with Bytes when you need speed and consistency.
- Use a Take-Home Challenge when you want to inspect realistic async work.
- Use CodePair when collaboration, debugging, or live decision-making is the main signal.